🌐 πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Έ EspaΓ±ol πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ English
Daitamo Logo

Improve Recovery and Operational Stability with AI

We anticipate how the plant will respond before the ore is processed and recommend concrete operational decisions in real time.

You don't need a large project to get started. We validate impact using your own data in a matter of weeks.

How we validate impact in your operation

Instead of long, uncertain projects, we work with a rapid validation approach: we use historical data from your operation to build models that replicate the actual behavior of the plant. This allows us to simulate past operational decisions and measure how much recovery, stability, or energy consumption could have been improved.

Result: a concrete business case before any implementation.

Validation Pilot Program (4–6 weeks)

A structured, low-risk way to demonstrate real impact using your own data.

01
Operational Understanding
WEEK 1
  • Identification of critical decisions
  • Review of available data
  • Definition of business objectives
02
Modeling
WEEKS 2–3
  • Models built on historical data
  • Ore β†’ plant behavior relationships
  • Identification of key patterns
03
Simulation
WEEK 4
  • Reproduction of past decisions
  • Simulation of alternative scenarios
  • Detection of improvement opportunities
04
Results
WEEKS 5–6
  • Estimated economic impact
  • Improvable operational KPIs
  • Implementation roadmap

How it integrates into your operation

Designed to work with existing infrastructure, without disrupting operations.

πŸ“‚ Uses existing data

The system uses data your operation already generates: plant historians, SCADA/DCS systems, laboratory, dispatch, and maintenance. No new instrumentation required to get started.

πŸ”’ Non-invasive implementation

It initially operates as an analysis and recommendation layer. It does not intervene directly in plant control until results have been validated.

🎯 Operational recommendations

System outputs are concrete actions: blend adjustments, setpoint changes, or suggested interventions. The operator always remains in control.

πŸ“ˆ Progressive scaling

Once impact is validated, the system can be integrated more deeply β€” automating decisions or connecting directly with operational systems.

Simplified architecture

Operational data (SCADA / historians / laboratory) β†’ behavior models β†’ decision engine β†’ real-time operational recommendations

The system adapts to your operation's existing architecture, whether on-premise or cloud-based.

What we need to get started

Minimum requirements to begin a pilot validation.

πŸ—„οΈ Historical data

Access to operational data from recent months (process, laboratory, or maintenance).

πŸ‘€ Operational contact

Someone on your team who understands the process and can validate operational decisions.

🎯 Clear objective

Define one priority: recovery, stability, energy, or maintenance.

Expected Impact

Typical results observed in the industry through models applied to operational data.

βš—οΈ Metallurgical Recovery

Estimated increase of 1% to 3% through anticipatory adjustment of process variables.

⚑ Energy Consumption

Potential reduction of 5% to 10% by optimizing the plant's operating point.

πŸ“Š Operational Stability

Fewer instability events through early detection of process deviations.

Operational Decisions That Can Be Anticipated

We use the data your operation already generates β€” from the mine to the plant β€” to anticipate future behaviors and deliver concrete recommendations.

βš—οΈ
B01 Β· PLANT

Metallurgical Recovery

Anticipatory decisions Β· Real-time operational adjustment

Recovery is defined before ore enters the plant, but today decisions are made without full visibility of their impact. Our system anticipates expected recovery based on incoming ore and recommends concrete operational adjustments in blending, grinding, and reagent dosing.

Ore β†’ plant response models Real-time recovery prediction Integration with operational systems
  • Decisions before processing, not after
  • Reduction of invisible losses
  • Greater consistency in recovery
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Incoming ore β†’ expected recovery β†’ recommended adjustment before processing
πŸ“‰
B02 Β· OPERATION

Operational Instability

Early detection Β· Intervention before the deviation

Most operational losses don't come from critical failures β€” they come from small accumulated deviations that go unnoticed. The system continuously monitors process variables and detects conditions that precede instability, enabling intervention before they impact production.

Multivariate anomaly detection Operational behavior analysis Anticipatory alerts
  • Intervention before the loss occurs
  • Lower process variability
  • Fewer unplanned stoppages
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Current deviations β†’ instability risk β†’ suggested preventive action
πŸͺ¨
B03 Β· MINE Β· PLANT

Ore Blend Variability

Optimal blending Β· Process stability

The plant operates most efficiently within specific ore ranges, but blending is typically defined by static rules or availability. The system evaluates the impact of each material combination before processing and recommends the feed sequence that maximizes stability and recovery.

Plant response models Blending optimization Dispatch integration
  • Lower process variability
  • More consistent recovery
  • More efficient use of available ore
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Blend options β†’ expected impact β†’ optimal feed sequence
⚑
B04 Β· ENERGY

Energy & Economic Optimization

Economic value Β· Beyond efficiency

Running at maximum throughput does not always maximize economic results. The system continuously calculates the optimal operating point considering energy, recovery, and ore type, recommending load and feed adjustments accordingly.

Multi-objective optimization Economic value models Dynamic setpoint adjustment
  • Higher value per tonne processed
  • Efficient energy use
  • Better balance between output and cost
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Current conditions β†’ expected economic value β†’ optimal operational adjustment
πŸ”§
B05 Β· MAINTENANCE

Predictive Maintenance

Intervention at the optimal moment

Failures are preceded by subtle changes in equipment behavior that are not visible through traditional monitoring. The system detects these early signals and estimates failure probability, recommending when to intervene to avoid unplanned stoppages.

Vibration & temperature analysis Degradation models Maintenance system integration
  • Fewer unexpected failures
  • Better maintenance planning
  • Reduced operational costs
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Current equipment state β†’ failure probability β†’ optimal intervention timing
πŸ”—
B06 Β· INTEGRATION

Mine–Plant Coordination

Aligned decisions Β· Integrated system

Extraction and processing decisions are usually optimized separately, creating systemic inefficiencies. The system connects both stages, anticipating how the ore extracted today will impact the plant and recommending coordinated adjustments across the operation.

Mine–plant historical models Operational impact prediction Planning & dispatch integration
  • Aligned decisions across departments
  • Lower plant variability
  • Better resource utilization
OPERATIONAL DECISION
Extraction decision β†’ plant impact β†’ coordinated system adjustment

Evaluate the impact on your operation

In a few weeks we can show you, using your own data, how much additional value your operation could generate through anticipatory decisions.

Request Pilot Evaluation β†’
← Back to all Portfolios